The first strong Assyrian state was formed in the
late Bronze Age in the wake of the decline of the
Mitanni, a confederation of tribes living along
the upper reaches of the Tigris River. In the fourteenth
century B.C.E., Ashururballit led his people
in an expansion westward, during which they
came to control the upper arch of the
Fertile Crescent for approximately a century.
The Assyrians ran up against the power of Aram
(situated in modern-day Syria), which blocked
their access to western trade routes. Still, the
early success coupled with the continued fighting
against Aram made the Assyrian army strong
and experienced, able to defend itself and mount
major raids far to the south and west. With this
powerful military, Assyria dominated the Near
East by the 900s B.C.E.
Initially, the Assyrians’ main objective was
to expand to the Mediterranean coast in order
to control the major trade routes of ancient
times. Assyrian armies finally overcame the
resistance of nations led by Aram, and they captured
the major city of Damascus in 732
B.C.E. Old Testament accounts tell of Assyrian
attacks into Samaria and Judah, and fighting
against the Egyptians. Assyria established
empire status under the leadership of Sargon II
(722–705 B.C.E.), who named himself after
the Sumerian leader Sargon the Great, the
first well-known conqueror. Sargon II’s son
Sennacherib maintained the lands his father
had conquered, and raided Asia Minor
after 700 B.C.E. Sennacherib established control
over Phoenician towns on the Mediterranean
coast all the way to the Egyptian frontier.
The last of the great emperors was Esarhaddon
(681–668 B.C.E.), who came to the throne
by murdering his father, Sennacherib. To secure
his frontiers, Esarhaddon coupled diplomacy
with warfare. He entered into agreements with
the Medes to the east and the Cimmerians to
the north, but also invaded Egypt, a nation
seemingly always in rebellion against the
Assyrian demands for tribute. By the end of
Esarhaddon’s reign, Assyrian territory stretched
from the Persian Gulf across the Fertile
Crescent and halfway down the Nile in Egypt.
Assurbanipal was the last of the Assyrian kings.
More of a scholar than a warrior, he let his generals
punish the rebellious while he established
a large library at Nineveh.
The Assyrian Empire came to an abrupt end
in 612 B.C.E. Three hundred years of warfare, both
conquests and the suppression of almost constant
rebellions, had put a serious strain on Assyrian
manpower. The birthrate had not kept up with
the casualty rate, and the Assyrians had been
obliged to use conscript troops, who proved of
doubtful loyalty. Agreements with neighbors
lapsed, and enemies pressed from all directions.
Ultimately the Medes led a coalition that laid
siege to the Assyrian capital city of Nineveh,
which fell after three months, spelling the end
of the empire, an end more celebrated than
lamented. The biblical prophet Nahum wrote,
“All who hear the news of you clap their hands
over you. For upon whom has not come your
unceasing evil?” Nahum summed it up perfectly;
Assyria had built and maintained its empire by military
force and terror, showing no mercy to any
defeated foe, whether in conquest or rebellion.
The Assyrians were the first people to institutionalize
cruelty to control the lands they
acquired. Towns destroyed in battle were left in
ruins as an example to other possible foes.
Ashurnasipal bragged, “I caused great slaughter. I
destroyed, I demolished, I burned. I took their
warriors prisoner and impaled them on stakes
before their cities. . . . I flayed the nobles, as
many as had rebelled, and spread their skins out
on the piles [of dead bodies]. . . . Many of the
captives I burned in a fire. Many I took alive;
from some I cut off their hands to the wrist, from
others I cut off their noses, ears and fingers; I put
out the eyes of many soldiers. I burnt their young
men and women to death.” This boast was not
just Ashurnasipal’s; every leader acted in the
same fashion. It is not surprising that they had to
deal with constant rebellion; they certainly
inspired no loyalty from their subjects.
Despite this negative characteristic, the
Assyrians contributed to society and culture.
Some of the world’s oldest roads were built in
the time of Sargon II. This road system allowed
for freer trade and the development of a postal
system. The Assyrian Empire was the first to construct aqueducts. Adopting cuneiform script
from the Babylonians, the Assyrians became the
world’s first serious historians. They established
a number of libraries, where they recorded scientific
knowledge acquired on their own and
from Babylon. They also inaugurated the first
widespread use of iron. Though iron was used by
the Hittites, the Assyrians were the first to use
the metal for weapons. As more iron-producing
territory came under their control, it became the
most common metal in tool production, far outperforming
anything made from bronze. Their
artists are regarded as masters of relief work,
with realistic and emotional portrayals of kings
at war and sport.
The Assyrians are best remembered, however,
for their accomplishments in warfare. Using chariots
(already invented), they were the first to add
cavalry to their army, which often proved the
decisive factor in their victories. Assyria was the
first state, but certainly not the last, to build its
society around the armed forces. They established
what may be called the first true empire, because
whereas most previous warriors cam paigned
mainly for loot and tribute, the Assyrians established
political control by appointing governors in
conquered lands. Had they had the statesmanship
skills to match their military prowess, they could
not only have lasted longer as an empire, but they
would also have had an even greater impact on
the progress of ancient society and culture.
See also Hittites; Sargon the Great.
References: Bury, J. B., S. A. Cook, and F. E. Adcock,
eds., The Cambridge Ancient History: The Assyrian
Empire (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
1923–1939); Laessoe, Jorgen, People of Ancient
Assyria, Their Inscriptions and Correspondence
(London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1963); Saggs,
H. W E, The Might That Was Assyria (London:
Sidgwick & Jackson, 1984).
2 comments:
Warfare is a fascinating subject. Despite the dubious morality of using violence to achieve personal or political aims. It remains that conflict has been used to do just that throughout recorded history.
Your article is very well done, a good read.
Warfare is a fascinating subject. Despite the dubious morality of using violence to achieve personal or political aims. It remains that conflict has been used to do just that throughout recorded history.
Your article is very well done, a good read.
Post a Comment